Which root canal technique hurts less? new study has answers
NCT ID NCT07562139
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compared two ways to fill a root canal after treating a painful tooth infection (irreversible pulpitis). 56 people aged 18-60 took part. One group got a continuous wave condensation filling, the other a single-cone filling. Researchers measured how long each method took, how well the filling sealed the tooth, pain levels after treatment, and whether the tooth was still healthy 6 months later.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for IRREVERSIBLE PULPITIS are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Faculty of Odonto-Stomatology, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University
Huế, Hue, 49000, Vietnam
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a simpler procedure save children's aching baby teeth?
- Could a simpler dental procedure spare kids from a painful root canal?
- Could a simpler tooth procedure spare kids from root canals?
- Bee glue vs. toothache: could propolis replace standard pulpotomy care?
- Could a tooth's own pulp be used to regenerate root canals?
- Pill or injection? trial tests which piroxicam method best eases root canal pain