Which filling heals tooth infections better? new study to find out
NCT ID NCT07477171
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two materials used to fill root canals during retreatment of infected teeth: standard gutta-percha and a newer material called MTA. About 58 adults with small infections around the tooth root will be treated and followed for one year. Researchers will check healing on X-rays, pain levels, and any tooth color changes.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for APICAL PERIODONTITIS are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
School of Medicine and Dentistry
Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, 15705, Spain
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a gentler root canal save more tooth and still heal infection?
- Can tiny silver particles supercharge root canal healing?
- Can a different rinse cut pain after root treatment in kids?
- Could the way a dentist moves a tiny file ease root canal pain?
- Can regenerating tooth tissue beat root canals for healing dental infections?
- Which root canal motion hurts least? trial puts five techniques to the test