Dental retreatment showdown: Gutta-Percha vs. MTA
NCT ID NCT07477171
First seen Mar 30, 2026 · Last updated Apr 30, 2026 · Updated 6 times
Summary
This study compares two materials used to refill root canals after a previous treatment failed. About 58 adults with small dental infections will receive either gutta-percha or mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). The main goal is to see which material leads to better healing of the infection over one year, while also checking for pain and tooth color changes.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ROOT CANAL THERAPY are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Study contacts
-
Contact
Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Locations
-
School of Medicine and Dentistry
Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, 15705, Spain
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.