Robot vs. surgeon: which cochlear implant method gives better hearing?

NCT ID NCT07081542

First seen Jun 27, 2026 ยท Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares two ways to insert a cochlear implant: using a robotic device or the standard manual method. Researchers want to see which approach leads to better hearing one year after surgery. The study will enroll 32 adults with hearing loss, randomly assigning them to one of the two techniques. Both methods are already approved and considered safe.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only โ€” not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
IotaSoft Robotic Insertion System
What this could lead to
If robotic insertion proves better, it could become the new standard for cochlear implants, potentially improving hearing outcomes and reducing inner ear damage.
What could go wrong
This is a small early-stage study with only 32 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The robotic device is already FDA-approved, but the study may find no significant difference between methods.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for BILATERAL HEARING LOSS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • AdventHealth Celebration

    Kissimmee, Florida, 34747, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.