Can a Blood-Derived gel save infected teeth after failed root canals?

NCT ID NCT07448571

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares standard root canal retreatment with a regenerative method using injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) in 140 adults with persistent tooth infections. Participants are randomly assigned to one of the two treatments and followed for two years to assess healing, pain, and tooth survival. The goal is to see if the regenerative approach leads to better outcomes.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF)
What this could lead to
If successful, this could offer a better way to heal persistent tooth infections after failed root canals, potentially saving more teeth.
What could go wrong
This is a relatively small, early-stage trial. The regenerative approach may not outperform standard retreatment, and long-term success is uncertain.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for APICAL PERIODONTITIS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Periapical Diseases periapical periodontitis

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Email: •••••@•••••

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

  • Marmara University

    RECRUITING

    Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

    Contact Email: •••••@•••••

    Contact

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.