Pilates vs. physio: which eases back pain better?

NCT ID NCT07543952

Completed Symptom relief Sponsor: Uskudar University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compared reformer Pilates exercises with conventional physiotherapy (like heat, TENS, and exercises) in 42 adults with chronic low back pain lasting at least 12 weeks. The goal was to see which approach better reduces pain, improves daily function, and boosts quality of life. Both groups exercised three times a week, and researchers measured changes after treatment.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: reformer Pilates exercises and conventional physiotherapy (electrotherapy, TENS, ultrasound, therapeutic exercises)
What this could lead to: If reformer Pilates proves more effective, it could offer a new exercise option for managing chronic low back pain.
What could go wrong: This is a small, completed trial with only 42 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The study only looks at short-term effects, and benefits may not last.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for LOW BACK PAIN are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Low Back Pain

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

LOW BACK PAIN

Contacts and locations

Locations

üsküdar University

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.