Which exercise wins for Athletes' back pain? a Head-to-Head test

NCT ID NCT07760103

First seen Aug 12, 2026 · Last updated Aug 13, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial compares two supervised exercise programs for recreational athletes with non-specific low back pain—pain without a clear medical cause. One program focuses on core endurance using plank exercises, while the other targets deep core muscles through segmental stabilization. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the programs, doing three sessions per week for six weeks. The study measures changes in pain, functional status, balance, and core endurance to see which approach offers better relief.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Two supervised exercise programs: core endurance exercises (planks) and segmental stabilization exercises (targeting deep core muscles)
What this could lead to
If one program proves more effective, it could point to a better, exercise-based approach for managing low back pain in recreational athletes.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage trial with 60 participants, so results may not apply to all athletes. Also, exercise benefits depend on adherence and may vary individually.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ATHLETIC INJURIES are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Athletic Injuries Low Back Pain

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.