AI vs. expert: which radiation plan causes fewer side effects?

NCT ID NCT06625034

First seen Nov 01, 2025 · Last updated May 20, 2026 · Updated 30 times

Summary

This study tests whether using a computer program (RapidPlan) to plan radiation therapy for prostate cancer leads to fewer side effects than the current method where a human expert creates the plan. About 108 adults with prostate cancer will be randomly assigned to one of the two planning methods. The main goal is to see if the computer-assisted approach is at least as good at avoiding serious urinary or bowel side effects.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PROSTATE CARCINOMA are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

  • Mayo Clinic in Arizona

    RECRUITING

    Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259, United States

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

    Contact

Conditions

Explore the condition pages connected to this study.