Heart study pits new vs old ablation tech for better scarring
NCT ID NCT06220006
First seen Apr 17, 2026 · Last updated May 14, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This study compares two types of ablation (pulsed field vs cryoballoon) for people with atrial fibrillation, a heart rhythm problem. About 104 participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two methods. The main goal is to see which technique creates better scar tissue around the veins that trigger the abnormal rhythm, as seen on a heart MRI 3 months after the procedure.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ATRIAL FIBRILLATION are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona
RECRUITINGBarcelona, Catalonia, 08036, Spain
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Contact
Contact
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.