New scan could spot dangerous prostate cancer without needle biopsy
NCT ID NCT03471650
First seen Jun 27, 2026 ยท Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tests whether a special PET/CT scan using a radioactive tracer called 18F-DCFPyL can better detect aggressive prostate cancer in men with elevated PSA levels. About 150 men with PSA between 2-10 ng/mL and no prior biopsy will receive the scan before their standard biopsy. The goal is to see if the scan is more accurate than PSA alone at identifying cancers that need treatment.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only โ not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- 18F-DCFPyL (a radioactive tracer for PET/CT imaging)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this scan could become a more accurate, non-invasive way to detect aggressive prostate cancer early, reducing unnecessary biopsies.
- What could go wrong
- This is a single-center, phase II study with only 150 men, so results may not apply to everyone. The scan may not be better than current methods and could still miss some cancers.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PROSTATE CANCER are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
SKCCC
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a new tracer light up hidden prostate cancer?
- Could deep breaths before surgery ward off Post-Op confusion?
- A second look: MRI screening may spot hidden prostate cancers
- Can precision protons spare the bowel in prostate cancer?
- AI coaches doctors on cancer risk talks
- Can an immune booster make hormone therapy work better against prostate cancer?