New prostate surgery technique aims to reduce side effects without sacrificing cancer control

NCT ID NCT05155501

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares a standard robot-assisted prostate removal surgery to a newer, pelvic fascia-sparing approach that aims to preserve nerves and support structures. Researchers will enroll 600 men with localized prostate cancer to see if the new technique offers similar cancer control while improving urinary function and reducing complications like penile shortening or hernias. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two surgical methods and followed for cancer recurrence and quality of life.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (standard and pelvic fascia-sparing)

What this could lead to

If successful, this could show that a less invasive surgical technique provides similar cancer control with better urinary function and fewer side effects.

What could go wrong

This is a surgical technique comparison, not a new drug or cure. Results may not apply to all prostate cancer patients, and the new approach may not improve outcomes as hoped.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PROSTATE CANCER are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

prostate cancer

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

  • Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope

    RECRUITING

    Duarte, California, 91010, United States

    Contact

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC)

    RECRUITING

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

    Contact

    Contact Email: •••••@•••••

  • Georgetown University

    RECRUITING

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007, United States

    Contact Email: •••••@•••••

    Contact

  • Hackensack Meridian Health

    RECRUITING

    Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601, United States

    Contact

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

  • Johns Hopkins University

    RECRUITING

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States

    Contact

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

    RECRUITING

    New York, New York, 10065, United States

    Contact

    Contact Email: •••••@•••••

  • NewYork-Presbyterian Queens

    RECRUITING

    Flushing, New York, 11355, United States

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

    Contact

  • Northwestern University

    RECRUITING

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

    Contact

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

  • Weill Cornell Medicine

    RECRUITING

    New York, New York, 10065, United States

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••