Which biopsy method is better? study compares pipelle and karman
NCT ID NCT07366814
First seen Jan 27, 2026 · Last updated May 13, 2026 · Updated 17 times
Summary
This study looked at 480 women with abnormal or postmenopausal bleeding who needed a biopsy of the uterine lining. All women received the same local numbing medicine, then were randomly assigned to have the biopsy using either a Pipelle or Karman device. The goal was to see which method more often provided a sample good enough for diagnosis, and to compare pain, satisfaction, and cost.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ABNORMAL UTERINE BLEEDING are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
University of Health Sciences, Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.