Which biopsy method is better for diagnosing uterine bleeding?
NCT ID NCT07366814
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compared two common biopsy methods—Pipelle and Karman cannula—for diagnosing abnormal uterine bleeding in 480 women. All participants received the same local anesthetic to ensure fair pain comparison. The goal was to see which method provides better tissue samples and a more comfortable experience.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ABNORMAL UTERINE BLEEDING are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
University of Health Sciences, Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)