Which surgery saves sight better after eye injection infection?

NCT ID NCT07717944

First seen Jul 21, 2026 · Last updated Jul 22, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two surgical approaches for treating a serious eye infection (endophthalmitis) that can occur after an injection into the eye. One group receives a combined surgery that removes the eye's natural lens along with infected vitreous gel (phacovitrectomy), while the other has only the vitreous gel removed (vitrectomy alone). The main goal is to see which method leads to better vision three months after surgery, and to track complications and the need for additional procedures.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
a surgical procedure: phacovitrectomy (combined cataract removal and vitrectomy) or pars plana vitrectomy alone
What this could lead to
If one surgery proves better, it could guide surgeons on the best approach to save vision in patients with severe eye infections after injections.
What could go wrong
This is a small, retrospective study with only 40 patients, so results may not apply to everyone. Both surgeries carry risks like infection, bleeding, or vision loss.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ENDOPHTHALMITIS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Benha University

    Banhā, Benha, 13111, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.