Which oxygen method saves more lives? large trial tests standard vs High-Flow

NCT ID NCT04468126

First seen Jun 27, 2026 ยท Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study tested whether giving high-flow heated oxygen through nasal prongs helps more people survive severe breathing failure than standard oxygen masks. Over 1,500 adults with low blood oxygen levels were randomly assigned to one of the two oxygen methods. The main goal was to see who was alive 28 days later.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only โ€” not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
oxygen therapy (standard low-flow oxygen vs high-flow nasal cannula oxygen)
What this could lead to
If high-flow oxygen proves better, it could become the standard first-line oxygen therapy for acute respiratory failure, potentially reducing deaths.
What could go wrong
This trial is completed but results are not yet widely implemented; earlier studies showed mixed results, especially in immunocompromised patients, so the benefit may not be universal.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ACUTE RESPIRATORY FAILURE are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • CHu Poitiers

    Poitiers, 86000, France

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.