Newborn infection risk detected in hours with Light-Based score
NCT ID NCT07109856
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tests a new, non-invasive tool called the POP-Score to predict infection in newborns within the first 6 hours of life. The score combines light-based measurements of muscle oxygen with routine vital signs like heart rate and blood pressure. Researchers will enroll 93 newborns with breathing problems to see if the score can accurately predict elevated infection markers within 48 hours.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could give doctors a simple, non-invasive way to spot infections in newborns hours earlier than current methods.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-phase study at one hospital. The score may not work as well in larger, more diverse groups or in real-world settings.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for INFECTION are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Medical University of Graz, Division of Neonatology
RECRUITINGGraz, Styria, 8036, Austria
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Aging in place: could mobile teams keep nursing home residents out of the hospital?
- A pillow shaped to protect the spine after surgery — a small trial puts it to the test
- Dye-Free laser imaging could replace standard dye in colorectal surgery
- Drone Warfare's hidden toll: new study tracks infection risk in combat wounds
- Rapid molecular tests could help doctors prescribe antibiotics more precisely
- Do future doctors know the skin risks of tattoos and piercings?