Which procedure wins for dense kidney stones?

NCT ID NCT04346134

First seen Aug 12, 2026 · Last updated Aug 14, 2026 · Updated 2 times

Summary

This trial compares two procedures for treating hard, medium-sized kidney stones (10-20 mm) that are not in the lower pole of the kidney. One is mini-PNL, a minimally invasive surgery, and the other is SWL, which uses shock waves to break up stones. The study will randomly assign 72 adults to one of the two procedures and track how completely the stones are cleared and any complications over three months.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Two procedures: miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PNL) and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL)
What this could lead to
If one procedure proves safer and more effective, it could become the preferred standard for treating medium-sized, dense kidney stones, reducing the need for repeat treatments.
What could go wrong
This is a single study with 72 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Both procedures carry risks like bleeding, infection, or incomplete stone removal.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Urology Department, Al-Azhar University Hospital

    Cairo, 11633, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.