Should you sync your workouts to your cycle? new study seeks answers
NCT ID NCT05697263
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Aug 14, 2026 · Updated 3 times
Summary
This study looks at whether scheduling workouts based on menstrual cycle phases improves fitness in women who exercise regularly. About 111 female athletes will follow different training schedules over three cycles. Researchers will measure changes in aerobic fitness, muscle strength, and body composition. The goal is to provide reliable, evidence-based advice for female athletes.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this study could provide clear, evidence-based guidance on whether tailoring workouts to menstrual cycle phases improves athletic performance.
- What could go wrong
- This is an early-stage, observational-style trial with no treatment. Results may show no benefit from periodization, and findings may not apply to all athletes.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Angelica Lindén Hirschberg
RECRUITINGStockholm, 17176, Sweden
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- One-Legged training might fix strength imbalance and elevate basketball performance
- Water workouts could be the key to back pain relief
- Can a bench press between squats supercharge your jump?
- Breathing trick could give volleyball players an edge
- Can online workouts bring fitness to adults with cerebral palsy?
- Can a new classification system tailor dementia care to each person?