Which mapping system wins for repeat AF ablation?
NCT ID NCT04835844
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compared two heart-mapping systems, RHYTHMIA and CARTO, in 49 adults undergoing a repeat procedure for atrial fibrillation (AF). The goal was to see which system better finds gaps from previous ablations. The study did not test a new treatment but aimed to improve understanding of how to perform these procedures more effectively.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PAROXYSMAL ATRIAL FIBRILLATION are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a bigger balloon tame the Heart's electrical chaos?
- Can a new heart ablation technique work without x-rays?
- Could a gentle sedation cocktail replace general anesthesia for heart ablation?
- Can a new freezing balloon tame a fluttering heart as well as the old one?
- Heart signals may reveal if a common AFib procedure will last
- Zapping the heart back to rhythm: a new device uses pulsed fields to treat atrial fibrillation