Major trial to settle best surgery for womb prolapse
NCT ID NCT07566949
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two common surgeries for uterine prolapse (when the womb drops down). About 426 women will be randomly assigned to have either a Manchester procedure or a vaginal hysterectomy. Researchers will track success rates, symptom relief, and quality of life for up to 10 years to see which operation works better.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE (POP) are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Helsinki University Hospital
RECRUITINGHelsinki, Finland
-
Hospital Nova, The Wellbeing Services County of Central Finland
RECRUITINGJyväskylä, Finland
-
Kuopio University Hospital
RECRUITINGKuopio, Finland
-
Oulu University Hospital
RECRUITINGOulu, Finland
-
Tampere University Hospital
RECRUITINGTampere, Finland
-
Turku University Hospital
RECRUITINGTurku, Finland
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a Blood-Derived injection strengthen pelvic floor repair?
- A simple diet and muscle relaxant may sharpen views in scarless hysterectomy
- Can a new mesh implant fix pelvic organ prolapse better?
- New study tests which surgery works best for rectal prolapse in women
- New exercise combo may offer relief for uterine prolapse sufferers
- New stitch could speed up hysterectomy surgery