New study tests which surgery works best for rectal prolapse in women

NCT ID NCT07673406

First seen Jun 29, 2026 · Last updated Jun 30, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial compares two surgical techniques for women with full-thickness rectal prolapse: a modified rectosacrouteropexy and the standard Wells rectopexy. The goal is to see which method leads to fewer recurrences, fewer complications, and better pelvic floor function. Thirty-six women will be assigned to one of the two procedures and followed after surgery.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

surgical procedure (modified rectosacrouteropexy vs. Wells rectopexy)

What this could lead to

If one technique proves better, it could reduce prolapse recurrence and improve pelvic floor function after surgery.

What could go wrong

This is a small, early-stage study with only 36 participants, so results may not apply to all women. Surgery carries risks like infection or mesh complications.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE (POP) are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

pelvic organ prolapse rectal prolapse

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Surgery, Biochemistry

    Baku, AZ1030, Azerbaijan