New study tests which surgery works best for rectal prolapse in women

NCT ID NCT07673406

Ongoing Disease control Sponsor: Azerbaijan Medical University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 29, 2026 · Last updated Jun 30, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial compares two surgical techniques for women with full-thickness rectal prolapse: a modified rectosacrouteropexy and the standard Wells rectopexy. The goal is to see which method leads to fewer recurrences, fewer complications, and better pelvic floor function. Thirty-six women will be assigned to one of the two procedures and followed after surgery.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: surgical procedure (modified rectosacrouteropexy vs. Wells rectopexy)
What this could lead to: If one technique proves better, it could reduce prolapse recurrence and improve pelvic floor function after surgery.
What could go wrong: This is a small, early-stage study with only 36 participants, so results may not apply to all women. Surgery carries risks like infection or mesh complications.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE (POP) are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

pelvic organ prolapse rectal prolapse

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE (POP) RECTAL PROLAPSE

Contacts and locations

Locations

Surgery, Biochemistry

Baku, AZ1030, Azerbaijan

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.