Wireless pacemaker takes on traditional device in heart study

NCT ID NCT05498376

First seen Jun 27, 2026 ยท Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares a new leadless pacemaker (Micra AV) to a standard dual-chamber pacemaker in 100 patients aged 70 and older with heart block. The goal is to see if the leadless version works just as well for exercise capacity. Participants are randomly assigned to receive one of the two devices, and their exercise ability is measured after implantation.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only โ€” not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Leadless pacemaker (Micra AV) and conventional dual-chamber pacemaker
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that a leadless pacemaker works as well as a traditional one for maintaining exercise ability, offering a less invasive option with fewer complications.
What could go wrong
This is a small, single-center trial with only 100 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The leadless device may not match the conventional one in performance, and long-term benefits are still uncertain.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ARRHYTHMIAS, CARDIAC are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Inselspital, Bern University Hospital

    Bern, 3010, Switzerland

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.