Robot vs. navigation: which knee surgery tech wins?

NCT ID NCT07574762

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two advanced technologies used in total knee replacement: computer-assisted navigation and robotic-arm assistance. Both aim to place the new knee joint more precisely. The trial will follow 140 patients for two years to see if one method helps them forget they have an artificial knee more than the other. The goal is to find out if the extra cost and complexity of robotic surgery leads to better results.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this study could show that robotic-arm assistance offers no major advantage over standard navigation for knee replacement, helping surgeons choose the most effective and cost-efficient technique.
What could go wrong
This is a relatively small, single-center trial comparing two similar technologies. The results may not apply to all patients or surgeons, and the study is not designed to prove one method is superior.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for OSTEOARTHRITIS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

  • Groupe hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon

    RECRUITING

    Paris, Paris, 75020, France

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.