Tooth rinse showdown: which cleans better before a root repair?
NCT ID NCT06757660
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study tested two different irrigation (rinsing) methods used just before repairing a hole in a tooth's root (furcation perforation). Forty adults with this type of tooth damage received either a chitosan or sodium hypochlorite rinse. Researchers measured pain levels and healing over 9 months to see which approach worked better.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- chitosan and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) irrigation solutions
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could point toward a better way to clean tooth perforations before repair, reducing pain and improving healing.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed trial with only 40 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The benefit over standard care is uncertain.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
40 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Oct 2023
- Finished
-
Jul 2024
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 40 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with old furcation perforation of mandibular molar. * Size of perforation should be of average 1 to 2 mm. * Period till treatment should be done within one month. * Presence of polyp at the site of perforation is required in this study. Exclusion Criteria: * Teeth in need for post retained restoration. * Immunocompromised patients. * Pregnant women and smokers. * Patients with a history of antibiotic or analgesics intake within the few days before the intervention and cases with previously initiated endodontic treatment.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Furcation defects are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Minia University, Faculty of Dentistry
Minya, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a Skin-Derived graft match the gold standard for saving molars?
- Blood-Derived clot may regrow bone in gum disease
- Texting your way to healthier gums: new study tests phone reminders for Hard-to-Clean teeth
- Gum repair breakthrough? new combo treatment shows promise for Tooth-Saving surgery
- Animal membranes battle to save molars: which works best?
- Can surgery save more teeth from severe gum disease?