Gum showdown: calibrated brushes may beat regular ones for healthy smiles

NCT ID NCT06848790

Completed Disease control Sponsor: Hospices Civils de Lyon Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study tested whether using a calibrated interdental brush (sized to fit each gap) reduces gum bleeding better than a non-calibrated brush in 51 healthy young adults aged 18-30. Participants used one type of brush daily for three months. The main goal was to compare gum inflammation between the two groups. Results could help improve daily oral hygiene advice.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: interdental brush (calibrated or non-calibrated)
What this could lead to: If calibrated brushes prove more effective, this could lead to clearer recommendations for preventing gum disease and related health issues.
What could go wrong: This is a small, completed trial with only 51 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The study does not test long-term health outcomes.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for MICROBIOTA-RELATED DISEASE are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

periodontal disorder

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

Service de Soins Dentaires Et D'Odontologie

Lyon, France

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.