Which humidifier prevents airway blockages in trauma ICU patients?

NCT ID NCT07713238

First seen Jul 20, 2026 · Last updated Jul 21, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial compares two ways to humidify air for trauma patients on prolonged mechanical ventilation: active heated humidifiers and passive heat-and-moisture exchangers. The goal is to see which method reduces airway complications like mucus plugs and tube blockages, and improves outcomes such as pneumonia rates and time on the ventilator. The study involves 162 adult trauma ICU patients expected to need ventilation for at least 7 days.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Airway humidification device (active heated humidifier or passive heat-and-moisture exchanger)
What this could lead to
If one method proves superior, it could reduce airway blockages and pneumonia in trauma ICU patients, potentially shortening ventilation time and hospital stays.
What could go wrong
This is a single-center trial with 162 patients, so results may not apply broadly. The study compares existing devices, so no new treatment is being tested.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CRITICAL ILLNESS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

  • Trauma Intensive Care Units, Assiut University Hospital

    Asyut, Asyut Governorate, 71515, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.