Which anesthesia is better for joint replacement? large trial aims to find out

NCT ID NCT06747494

Recruiting now Knowledge-focused Sponsor: University of Miami Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares general anesthesia (being fully asleep) with spinal anesthesia (numbing only the lower body) for people having hip or knee replacement surgery. Researchers will track recovery time, pain, nausea, infections, and other complications in about 2,400 participants. The goal is to see which method leads to better outcomes and faster recovery.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to: If this trial succeeds, it could help doctors choose the best anesthesia method for joint replacement surgery, leading to shorter hospital stays and fewer complications.
What could go wrong: This is a large trial, but it only compares two standard anesthesia methods—it won't introduce a new treatment. Results may not apply to all patients or hospitals.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

osteoarthritis, hip osteoarthritis, knee

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS

Contacts and locations

Locations

University of Miami
RECRUITING

Miami, Florida, 33136, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.