Knee replacement showdown: fixed vs. mobile bearing – which is better?

NCT ID NCT00435357

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compared two types of total knee replacements in 160 patients with medial knee arthritis. One group received a fixed-bearing implant, the other a mobile-bearing implant. Researchers measured knee function and X-ray results to see if one design leads to better outcomes.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
total knee replacement (fixed-bearing or mobile-bearing device)
What this could lead to
If one design proves clearly better, it could guide surgeons to choose the best implant for patients with knee arthritis.
What could go wrong
This is a completed, moderate-sized trial, but results may not apply to all types of knee arthritis or to patients with prior knee surgeries.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for KNEE ARTHRITIS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

osteoarthritis, knee Patella Fracture

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Sebastien Lustig

    Lyon, 69300, France

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.