Which emergency dialysis saves more lives? a new study investigates

NCT ID NCT07765030

Not yet recruiting Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Antalya Health Sciences University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Aug 14, 2026 · Last updated Aug 14, 2026

Summary

This study looks back at medical records of critically ill adults who needed emergency dialysis in the emergency department. It compares two methods—standard hemodialysis and a continuous version called CVVHDF—to see how patients fare during their hospital stay. The main focus is on survival, but it also tracks complications, ICU admissions, and length of stay. No new treatments are given; the goal is simply to learn from real-world experience.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to: This study could help identify which emergency dialysis method is associated with better survival, guiding treatment decisions for critically ill patients with acute kidney failure.
What could go wrong: As an observational study, it cannot prove cause and effect. Results may be influenced by patient differences and may not apply to other hospitals or settings.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

acute kidney injury kidney failure

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY KIDNEY FAILURE KIDNEY FAILURE, ACUTE

Contacts and locations

Locations

University of Health Sciences, Antalya Training and Research Hospital

Antalya, konyaaltı, 21090, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.