CT-Guided heart stenting could cut procedure time and radiation
NCT ID NCT07592312
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study tests whether using a CT scan to plan a heart stent procedure (PCI) makes it faster, safer, and more effective than the usual approach. About 200 adults with coronary artery disease will either get CT-guided planning or standard care. Researchers will compare procedure time, radiation exposure, and contrast dye use, and follow participants for one year.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-guided procedural planning
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could make coronary stenting faster, safer, and more precise by using CT scans to plan the procedure beforehand.
- What could go wrong
- This is an early-stage feasibility study with only 200 participants, so results may not apply to all patients. The CT-based plan may not always match what the doctor sees during the procedure.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES (ACS) are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a higher dose of adenosine sharpen heart scans?
- Can a tailored Blood-Thinner combo prevent second heart attacks without causing bleeding?
- Can a personalized exercise plan boost heart rehab for seniors?
- Can your genes predict blood thinner effectiveness?
- Heart rehab goes hybrid: can a mix of home and clinic sessions boost adherence?
- Can a simpler, faster ECG match the gold standard?