Blood clot prevention: which strategy saves most lives and money?

NCT ID NCT07455253

First seen Jun 27, 2026 ยท Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study reviews medical records of 234 women who had gynecological surgery to see which method of preventing blood clots (like using compression devices or blood thinners) works best and is most cost-effective. Researchers will compare different prevention strategies to find the optimal balance between safety and cost. The goal is to provide evidence that helps doctors choose the right prevention plan for each patient.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only โ€” not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this could help hospitals choose the most cost-effective way to prevent dangerous blood clots after gynecological surgery, potentially saving lives and money.
What could go wrong
This is a retrospective study, not a controlled trial, so results may be less reliable. It only looks at past data from one hospital, so findings might not apply to all patients.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS (DVT) are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University

    Nantong, China

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.