Tiny camera surgery may beat standard back procedure for faster pain relief

NCT ID NCT06615518

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This completed study compared two minimally invasive surgeries for herniated discs: full endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD) and microdiscectomy (MD). Researchers enrolled 200 adults aged 18-85 with single-level disc herniation and sciatica. The goal was to see which technique provides better early pain relief and faster recovery, while also using MRI scans to guide treatment decisions.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Full endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD) and microdiscectomy (MD) surgical procedures
What this could lead to
If FELD proves superior, it could offer patients a less invasive option with faster recovery and less early pain after surgery for herniated discs.
What could go wrong
This is a completed study with 200 participants, so results are available but may not apply to all patients. Both surgeries carry standard surgical risks like infection or nerve damage.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for DISC HERNIATION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Uniwesytecki Szpital Kliniczny

    Opole, Opole Voivodeship, 45-001, Poland

  • Wojewódzki Szpital Specjalistyczny im Św Jadwigi w Opolu

    Opole, Opole Voivodeship, 45-221, Poland

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.