Can a closer look at the stomach spot hidden infections?

NCT ID NCT06397066

First seen Aug 06, 2026 · Last updated Aug 07, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial compares two endoscopic techniques—standard white light endoscopy and magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging—to see which better identifies the status of Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection. About 384 participants will undergo both procedures, and the accuracy of each method will be checked against breath tests and tissue samples. The goal is to find a more reliable way to tell if someone has a current, past, or no H. pylori infection, potentially improving diagnosis and treatment decisions.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Two endoscopic procedures: white light endoscopy and magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging
What this could lead to
If magnifying endoscopy proves more accurate, it could improve how doctors diagnose H. pylori infections without needing biopsies.
What could go wrong
The trial is relatively small and results may not apply to all patients. Magnifying endoscopy requires special training and equipment, which may limit its widespread use.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • the First Hospital of Jilin University

    Changchun, Jilin, 130021, China

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.