Dental implant showdown: which design wins for stronger smiles?
NCT ID NCT07557836
First seen Jun 27, 2026 ยท Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at two different types of dental implants to see which one stays more stable and preserves bone better after placement. Thirty adults with missing back teeth received one of the two implant designs. Researchers measured implant stability and bone levels right after placement, then again at 3 and 6 months. The goal was to help dentists choose the best implant design for long-term success.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
30 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jun 2022
- Finished
-
Dec 2023
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion criteria: * Patients aged 18 years and above * Patients with missing mandibular premolars or molars requiring implant-supported restoration * Presence of adequate bone volume and density at the implant site for proper implant placement * Patients with good general health and no systemic conditions affecting healing * Patients maintaining satisfactory oral hygiene * Patients who are cooperative and able to understand the treatment procedure * Patients willing to undergo implant surgery and attend follow-up visits * Patients who provide written informed consent Exclusion criteria: * Patients with active infection or pathology at the implant site * Patients with insufficient bone quality or volume for implant placement * Patients with systemic diseases or conditions that may impair healing * Patients with a history of bleeding disorders or on anticoagulant therapy * Immunocompromised or medically compromised patients * Patients with poor oral hygiene or non-compliance * Pregnant or lactating women * Patients unwilling to participate or unable to provide informed consent
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Dental implant rehabilitation are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Career Postgraduate Institute of Dental Science and Hospital, Lucknow, Indi
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226020, India
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a light wand tame implant gum inflammation at home?
- Ozone gas may boost bone levels around dental implants
- Gum graft showdown: own tissue vs. collagen matrices for implant aesthetics
- Gum fluid clues may explain early implant bone loss
- Cheekbone implant study seeks best route for toothless upper jaw
- Which Mini-Implant size works best? new study aims to find out