Chocolate's secret ingredient takes on root canal pain

NCT ID NCT07790796

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing This study
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Aug 27, 2026 · Last updated Aug 28, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial tests whether cocoa husk, a byproduct of chocolate production, can reduce pain and bacteria after root canal treatment. Researchers will compare three approaches in 36 adults with a dead nerve in a lower molar: standard calcium hydroxide, cocoa husk alone, or a mix of both. Each participant receives one of these medications inside the tooth for a week. The goal is to see if cocoa husk offers a natural alternative to the usual antibacterial paste.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
cocoa husk and calcium hydroxide, used as intracanal medications during root canal treatment
What this could lead to
If cocoa husk works as well as or better than standard calcium hydroxide, it could offer a natural, low-cost option to ease pain and fight infection after root canal treatment.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early trial with only 36 patients, so results may not apply broadly. Cocoa husk might not reduce bacteria or pain as effectively as the standard treatment, and any new material carries a risk of irritation or allergic reaction.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 36 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Jan 2026

Expected to finish

Jan 2027

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 to 40 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria:1. Patients with an age range between 18 to 40. 2. Patients with necrotic pulp. 3. Restorable teeth. 4. Positive patient acceptance for participating in the study. 5. Type III distal and mesial canal of the first mandibular molar. 6. Patients have necrotic pulp with symptomatic apical periodontitis in mandibular first molars. \- Exclusion Criteria:1. Pregnant females 2. Medically compromised patients. 3. Patients having analgesics before the treatment 4. If antibiotics have been administered during the past two weeks pre-operatively. 5\. Patients having bruxism or clenching 6. Patients have severe malocclusion associated with traumatic occlusion. 7. Teeth that have: a. Peri-apical radiolucency b. Root resorption. c. Pulp stones or calcifications. d. Previous endodontic treatment \-

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Postoperative pain are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

dental pulp necrosis Pain, Postoperative

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Future University

    Cairo, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.