Brain scans and virtual reality aim to decode chronic breathlessness
NCT ID NCT07319039
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study uses brain scans (fMRI) to see if people with cancer, COPD, or heart failure have different brain activity patterns when they feel breathless. It also tests whether immersive virtual reality can help ease that breathlessness. Only 16 participants are being recruited to see if the approach is practical and acceptable.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- immersive virtual reality (IVR)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could reveal whether different diseases share the same brain pathways for breathlessness, guiding more tailored treatments.
- What could go wrong
- This is a very small feasibility study with only 16 participants, so results may not apply broadly. It focuses on testing the methods, not proving any treatment works.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CANCER are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Geneva University Hospitals
RECRUITINGGeneva, Canton of Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- A good Night's sleep: could a simple program ease Cancer's toll on rest?
- Could sitting up make radiation therapy more comfortable?
- Digital nurse companion: could an app ease the burden of chronic illness?
- Could continuing a common heart drug before surgery save lives?
- Can we predict dangerous side effects when combining radiation and immunotherapy?
- Family history as a shield: can culturally tailored guidance cut cancer risk?