Robot vs nurse: who keeps breathing tubes safer?
NCT ID NCT06965400
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested whether an automatic device (IntelliCuff) or manual checks by nurses better maintain safe air pressure in breathing tubes for 32 children in intensive care. The goal was to see which method keeps pressure in the ideal range and reduces nurse workload. Results will help decide if automatic monitoring is worth using in pediatric ICUs.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CUFF PRESSURE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Acibadem University, Acibadem Altunizade Hospital
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Aydin Obstetric and pediatrics Hospital
Aydin, 09020, Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Cam Sakura Research and Training Hospital
Istanbul, 34001, Turkey (Türkiye)
-
The Health Sciences University Izmir Behçet Uz Child Health and Diseases Research and Training Hospital
Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- A Mother's voice as medicine? trial tests comforting effect on ventilated children
- Could lung fluid proteins reveal a new way to track severe lung injury?
- Can inhaled sedation save money and improve outcomes for ventilated ICU patients?
- Brain waves reveal hidden effects of breathing machines on injured brains
- Can High-Flow oxygen through a tracheostomy speed ventilator weaning?
- Mapping the waking brain: how ICU patients emerge from sedation