Can a machine breathe better than a nurse? automated oxygen system tested in COPD
NCT ID NCT03464695
First seen Sep 09, 2026 · Last updated Sep 10, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
Researchers are testing whether an automated oxygen delivery system called O2matic keeps blood oxygen levels in a safe range better than manual adjustment for patients hospitalized with a COPD flare-up. The device continuously measures oxygen saturation and uses an algorithm to control oxygen flow. The trial enrolls 20 adults who need oxygen and are admitted for more than 48 hours. The main question is whether O2matic increases the time spent within the target oxygen range and reduces periods of severe low oxygen or too much oxygen.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- O2matic, an automated closed-loop oxygen delivery device
- What this could lead to
- If it works, hospitals could use automated oxygen systems to keep COPD patients' oxygen levels steadier and reduce dangerous highs and lows.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early study of 20 patients at one hospital. The device may not outperform manual oxygen control, and results may not apply to sicker patients or other hospitals.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
20 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
May 2018
- Finished
-
Aug 2018
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
35 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * COPD verified by FEV1/FVC \< 0,70 * Admission due to exacerbation in COPD * COPD exacerbation and pneumonia can be included * Duration of admission \> 48 hours * Need for oxygen supplementation at inclusion (SpO2 \<= 88 % without O2 suppl.) * Cognitively able to participate in the study * Willing to participate and give informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * Need or anticipated need for mechanical ventilation (except intermittent CPAP) * Major co-morbidities (cancer, heart disease, thromboembolic disease, uncontrolled diabetes) * Asthma or other respiratory condition requiring higher SpO2 than normal for COPD- patients * Pregnancy * Acute thromboembolic disease (\< 2 weeks) * Cognitive barriers for participation
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for COPD exacerbation are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Gentofte University Hospital
Hellerup, 2900, Denmark
-
Hvidovre University Hospital
Hvidovre, 2650, Denmark
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can virtual reality help COPD patients breathe easier in hospital?
- Can tilting a Patient's body toward the infection help them breathe free sooner?
- Can thin air curb your appetite? chamber study tests Oxygen's role in eating
- Can a battery keep ventilators running during ambulance transport?
- Can a simple ultrasound combo predict breathing failure before it happens?
- Could stepping down breathing support sooner save more lives?