Which dental implant guide is more accurate? new study investigates

NCT ID NCT06404385

Completed Knowledge-focused Sponsor: University of Valencia Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026

Summary

This study looked at 27 people who needed dental implants in the back of their mouth. Researchers compared two types of surgical guides—one made the traditional way and one made with a computer (CAD-CAM)—to see which one placed implants more accurately. They measured how far the actual implant position was from the planned position using 3D scans.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to: If successful, this could help dentists choose the most accurate guide for placing dental implants, potentially improving implant success and reducing complications.
What could go wrong: This is a small, completed study with only 27 patients, so results may not apply to everyone. The study measures accuracy but does not test long-term implant success or patient satisfaction.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for COMPUTER ASSISTED are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

COMPUTER ASSISTED DENTAL IMPLANT

Contacts and locations

Locations

University of Valencia. Faculty of Medecine and Dentistry. CLINICA ODONTOLOGICA

Valencia, Valencia, 46010, Spain

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.