Cutting vs. No-Cut: which dental implant method heals better?

NCT ID NCT07654452

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jul 08, 2026 · Updated 2 times

Summary

This study compares two ways to place dental implants in the upper front teeth area: one that involves cutting and lifting the gum (flap technique) and one that does not (flapless technique). Sixteen adults who have been missing a tooth in that area for over a year will receive an implant using one of these methods. Researchers will measure pain, swelling, implant stability, and bone changes over six months to see which approach leads to better outcomes.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If one technique proves better, it could guide dentists toward a less painful or more stable implant procedure for missing front teeth.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage study with only 16 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Individual healing and bone quality vary widely.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for DENTAL IMPLANT are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Tooth Loss

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Suez Canal University, Faculty of Dentistry

    Ismailia, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.