Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Ultrasound showdown: 2D vs 3D imaging for C-Section scar defects

NCT ID NCT07704788

Not yet recruiting Diagnosis Sponsor: Sohag University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jul 15, 2026 · Last updated Jul 16, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two types of ultrasound—2D and 3D—with and without saline infusion, to see which best detects defects in the scar from a previous C-section. Researchers will enroll 100 women aged 20-45 who have had at least one C-section. The goal is to find the most accurate imaging method and understand how scar size relates to symptoms.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this could identify the most accurate imaging method for detecting cesarean scar defects, potentially improving diagnosis and treatment planning.
What could go wrong
This is a small, single-center diagnostic study, so results may not apply broadly. The comparison may not reveal a clear winner, and the clinical impact depends on linking defects to symptoms.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for SCAR NICHE are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

SCAR NICHE

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.