Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Ultrasound showdown: 2D vs 3D imaging for C-Section scar defects

NCT ID NCT07704788

Diagnosis Sponsor: Sohag University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting This study
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jul 15, 2026 · Last updated Jul 16, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two types of ultrasound—2D and 3D—with and without saline infusion, to see which best detects defects in the scar from a previous C-section. Researchers will enroll 100 women aged 20-45 who have had at least one C-section. The goal is to find the most accurate imaging method and understand how scar size relates to symptoms.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this could identify the most accurate imaging method for detecting cesarean scar defects, potentially improving diagnosis and treatment planning.
What could go wrong
This is a small, single-center diagnostic study, so results may not apply broadly. The comparison may not reveal a clear winner, and the clinical impact depends on linking defects to symptoms.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

About 100 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Expected to start

Aug 2026

An estimate. Start dates often move.

Expected to finish

Jun 2027

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

women aged 20-45 years History of at least one previous cesarean section Interval since last cesarean section ranging from 6 months to 10 years Willingness to participate and provide written informed consent

Ages

20 to 45 years

Sex

Female participants only

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion criteria: * Women aged 20-45 years * History of at least one previous cesarean section * Interval since last cesarean section ranging from 6 months to 10 years * Willingness to participate and provide written informed consent Exclusion criteria: * Current pregnancy * Active pelvic infection or acute pelvic inflammatory disease * Large uterine fibroids distorting the uterine cavity * History of uterine surgery other than cesarean section (e.g., myomectomy) * Failure of SIS performance * Patients on any contraception methods

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Scar niche are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Scar niche

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  2. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.