Could a simple ultrasound replace an invasive scope for Post-Surgery uterine checks?

NCT ID NCT06924437

First seen Jul 14, 2026 · Last updated Jul 15, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study looks at two ways to examine the uterine cavity after women have had hysteroscopic surgery for conditions like polyps, fibroids, or a uterine septum. One method is a non-invasive 3D ultrasound; the other is an office hysteroscopy, which involves inserting a small camera into the uterus. The goal is to see if the ultrasound is accurate enough to replace the more invasive procedure, potentially reducing pain and cost for patients.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that a non-invasive 3D ultrasound can replace the more invasive office hysteroscopy for post-surgery checks, making follow-up easier and cheaper.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage study with only 50 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The accuracy of 3D ultrasound may still fall short of the direct view from hysteroscopy.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ABNORMAL UTERINE BLEEDING (AUB) are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Sohag university hospitals

    Sohag, 82511, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.