Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Heart surgery showdown: which procedure saves more lives after aortic tear?

NCT ID NCT06676371

First seen Mar 30, 2026 · Last updated May 20, 2026 · Updated 4 times

Summary

This study compares two surgical methods for a severe tear in the main artery from the heart (acute type A aortic dissection). One method is simpler (hemiarch repair), the other is more complex (total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk). The goal is to see which approach leads to fewer deaths within 30 days after surgery. The trial will enroll 150 adults whose tear is located beyond the first part of the aorta.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for AORTIC DISSECTION TYPE A are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

  • Prince of Wales Hospital

    Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

    Contact

  • Siriraj Hospital - Mahidol University

    Bangkok, Thailand

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

    Contact

  • University Hospital Vienna

    Vienna, Austria

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

    Contact

Conditions

Explore the condition pages connected to this study.