Crohn's surgery showdown: which technique wins?
NCT ID NCT04578392
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compared two surgical methods for removing diseased intestine in people with Crohn's disease: one that cuts the main artery high up, and one that spares the mesentery (the tissue holding the intestine). The goal was to see which technique better prevents the disease from coming back within 6 months. Only 13 adults with limited Crohn's disease took part before the study was stopped early.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- surgical procedure (high ligation vs. mesenteric sparing ileocolic resection)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could help identify a better surgical approach to reduce the chance of Crohn's disease returning after surgery.
- What could go wrong
- The trial was terminated early with very few participants (13), so results are limited and may not be reliable. It is unclear if either technique is truly better.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
13 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jul 2020
- Finished
-
Dec 2023
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 65 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Males and females 18-65 years of age. * Isolated ileocolic Crohn's disease of \<30 cm in length * Concurrent therapies with corticosteroids, 5-ASA drugs, thiopurines, MTX, antibiotics, anti-TNF, vedolizumab, ustekinumab therapy are permitted. * Ability to comply with protocol * Competent and able to provide written informed consent * Medically refractory disease or inability to tolerate ongoing medical therapy Exclusion Criteria:Inability to give informed consent. * Patients less than 18 years of age * Patients undergoing repeat ileocolic resection * Patients with concurrent disease in other locations (e.g. proximal stricturing of the small bowel, fistulizing disease to the sigmoid colon) requiring an additional intervention in the operating room beyond an ileocolic resection. * Patients with \>30 cm of terminal ileal disease * Patients who are undergoing an ileal resection only (NOT ileocecal) because the disease spares the distal most aspect of ileum and ileocecal valve * Patient whose anastomosis is diverted intra-operatively with a loop or end ileostomy * Clinically significant medical conditions within the six months before surgery: e.g. myocardial infarction, active angina, congestive heart failure or other conditions that would, in the opinion of the investigators, compromise the safety of the patient. * Specific exclusions; Evidence of hepatitis B, C, or HIV * History of cancer including melanoma (with the exception of localized skin cancers) * Emergent indication for an operation * Pregnant or breast feeding. * History of clinically significant auto-immunity (other than Crohn's disease) or any previous example of fat-directed autoimmunity * Inability to follow up at respective sites for the primary endpoint
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Crohn disease are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Cedars-Sinai Hospital System
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
-
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
-
Cleveland Clinic Florida
Weston, Florida, 33331, United States
-
Humanitas
Rozzano, Milano, 20089, Italy
-
Mt. Sinai
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5, Canada
-
St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institution
Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ, United Kingdom
-
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Mini-Guts in a dish: scientists probe why IBD tissue struggles to heal
- Can immune aging blood tests predict which older IBD patients thrive on advanced therapies?
- Can a liquid diet calm Crohn's in kids?
- Which IBD therapy works best for kids? researchers compare two approaches
- Can trained peer mentors ease the mental toll of IBD?
- Can a new pill tame inflammatory bowel disease?