Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

New hope for stroke survivors with rare clotting disorder: rivaroxaban vs warfarin

NCT ID NCT03684564

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study tested whether the drug rivaroxaban works as well as warfarin to prevent further brain damage in people who have had a stroke due to antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), a condition that causes abnormal blood clotting. About 40 participants took either rivaroxaban or warfarin for 24 months. The main goal was to see if brain scans showed less damage over time. This is a phase 2 trial, meaning it's an early test of effectiveness and safety.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Phase 2

Tests whether the treatment actually works, and watches for side effects, in a larger group.

Participants

43 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Jul 2021

Finished

Jul 2025

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria 1. Patients must be confirmed as having persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), defined as: positivity of one or more aPL, i.e. lupus anticoagulant, IgG and/or IgM anticardiolipin and/or anti beta 2 glycoprotein I antibodies at \>40 GPL or MPL units or \> the 99th centile of normal, on two or more occasions, at least 12 weeks apart. See Appendix 3 and Exclusion criteria for more information. 2. One or more of: a) Ischaemic stroke; b) transient ischaemic attack (TIA) with evidence of either acute or chronic ischaemic injury on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (including diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) lesion(s), previous cortical or subcortical infarction(s), or white matter hyperintensities) and diagnosed by a clinician with expertise in stroke; c) brain infarcts (territorial or subcortical) or white matter hyperintensities (WMH) of presumed vascular origin on brain MRI, with or without cognitive impairment; and an expert clinical opinion that anticoagulation is a reasonable treatment option (with the aim of preventing ischaemic brain injury). 3. Patients must weigh ≥ 50kg and ≤ 135kg. 4. Women must be on adequate contraception, barrier or hormonal, unless postmenopausal or sterilised. Exclusion Criteria 1. Patients who are triple positive for antiphospholipid antibodies (presence of lupus anticoagulant, IgG and/or IgM anticardiolipin and anti beta 2 glycoprotein I antibodies at \>40 GPL or MPL units or \> the 99th centile of normal\*. (\*patients who have previously been triple aPL-positive and have single or double aPL positivity on at least 2 occasions over at least 6 months, including once within 1 month prior to randomisation, can be recruited to the trial) 2. Pregnant or lactating women 3. Severe renal impairment with creatinine clearance \< 30 mL/min (i.e. 29 mL/min or less) 4. Liver function tests ALT \> 3 x ULN 5. Cirrhotic patients with Child Pugh B or C 6. Thrombocytopenia (platelets \< 75 x 109/L) 7. Non-adherence on warfarin (based on clinical assessment) 8. Patients taking strong inhibitors of both CYP3A4 and P-gp pathways such as 1. Systemic azole antifungals (e.g. ketoconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole) 2. Patients on human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors (e.g. ritonavir) 9. Patients on strong CYP3A4 inducers (e.g. rifampicin, phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital or St. John's Wort) 10. Patients on dronedarone 11. Patients on levetiracetam, sodium valproate/valproic acid, oxcarbazepine or topiramate 12. Patients less than 18 years of age 13. Refusal to consent to the site informing General Practitioner (GP) and Healthcare Professional responsible for anticoagulation care of the participant. 14. Contraindications to MRI (e.g. cardiac pacemaker, severe claustrophobia, inability to lie flat: patients who do not meet local safety rules for MRI). 15. Patients at high risk of bleeding and not suitable for anticoagulation therapy. 16. Previous known allergy or intolerance to warfarin or rivaroxaban. 17. Women planning to become pregnant within the 2-year follow-up period. 18. Patients with known galactose intolerance, total lactase deficiency or galactose malabsorption. 19. Patients who have had active cancer (excluding non-melanoma skin cancers) within the last 2 years 20. Any other reason that the PI or delegate considers would make the patient unsuitable to enter RISAPS.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Antiphospholipid syndrome are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Barts and the London Hospitals, Barts Health NHS Trust

    London, United Kingdom

  • Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust

    Epsom, United Kingdom

  • Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

    London, United Kingdom

  • Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

    London, United Kingdom

  • Queens Hospital, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust

    Romford, United Kingdom

  • University College Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

    London, United Kingdom

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.