New hope for stroke survivors with rare clotting disorder: rivaroxaban vs warfarin
NCT ID NCT03684564
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested whether the drug rivaroxaban works as well as warfarin to prevent further brain damage in people who have had a stroke due to antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), a condition that causes abnormal blood clotting. About 40 participants took either rivaroxaban or warfarin for 24 months. The main goal was to see if brain scans showed less damage over time. This is a phase 2 trial, meaning it's an early test of effectiveness and safety.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 2
Tests whether the treatment actually works, and watches for side effects, in a larger group.
- Participants
-
43 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jul 2021
- Finished
-
Jul 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria 1. Patients must be confirmed as having persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), defined as: positivity of one or more aPL, i.e. lupus anticoagulant, IgG and/or IgM anticardiolipin and/or anti beta 2 glycoprotein I antibodies at \>40 GPL or MPL units or \> the 99th centile of normal, on two or more occasions, at least 12 weeks apart. See Appendix 3 and Exclusion criteria for more information. 2. One or more of: a) Ischaemic stroke; b) transient ischaemic attack (TIA) with evidence of either acute or chronic ischaemic injury on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (including diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) lesion(s), previous cortical or subcortical infarction(s), or white matter hyperintensities) and diagnosed by a clinician with expertise in stroke; c) brain infarcts (territorial or subcortical) or white matter hyperintensities (WMH) of presumed vascular origin on brain MRI, with or without cognitive impairment; and an expert clinical opinion that anticoagulation is a reasonable treatment option (with the aim of preventing ischaemic brain injury). 3. Patients must weigh ≥ 50kg and ≤ 135kg. 4. Women must be on adequate contraception, barrier or hormonal, unless postmenopausal or sterilised. Exclusion Criteria 1. Patients who are triple positive for antiphospholipid antibodies (presence of lupus anticoagulant, IgG and/or IgM anticardiolipin and anti beta 2 glycoprotein I antibodies at \>40 GPL or MPL units or \> the 99th centile of normal\*. (\*patients who have previously been triple aPL-positive and have single or double aPL positivity on at least 2 occasions over at least 6 months, including once within 1 month prior to randomisation, can be recruited to the trial) 2. Pregnant or lactating women 3. Severe renal impairment with creatinine clearance \< 30 mL/min (i.e. 29 mL/min or less) 4. Liver function tests ALT \> 3 x ULN 5. Cirrhotic patients with Child Pugh B or C 6. Thrombocytopenia (platelets \< 75 x 109/L) 7. Non-adherence on warfarin (based on clinical assessment) 8. Patients taking strong inhibitors of both CYP3A4 and P-gp pathways such as 1. Systemic azole antifungals (e.g. ketoconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole) 2. Patients on human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors (e.g. ritonavir) 9. Patients on strong CYP3A4 inducers (e.g. rifampicin, phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital or St. John's Wort) 10. Patients on dronedarone 11. Patients on levetiracetam, sodium valproate/valproic acid, oxcarbazepine or topiramate 12. Patients less than 18 years of age 13. Refusal to consent to the site informing General Practitioner (GP) and Healthcare Professional responsible for anticoagulation care of the participant. 14. Contraindications to MRI (e.g. cardiac pacemaker, severe claustrophobia, inability to lie flat: patients who do not meet local safety rules for MRI). 15. Patients at high risk of bleeding and not suitable for anticoagulation therapy. 16. Previous known allergy or intolerance to warfarin or rivaroxaban. 17. Women planning to become pregnant within the 2-year follow-up period. 18. Patients with known galactose intolerance, total lactase deficiency or galactose malabsorption. 19. Patients who have had active cancer (excluding non-melanoma skin cancers) within the last 2 years 20. Any other reason that the PI or delegate considers would make the patient unsuitable to enter RISAPS.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Antiphospholipid syndrome are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Barts and the London Hospitals, Barts Health NHS Trust
London, United Kingdom
-
Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust
Epsom, United Kingdom
-
Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
London, United Kingdom
-
Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
London, United Kingdom
-
Queens Hospital, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust
Romford, United Kingdom
-
University College Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
London, United Kingdom
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Robot could let stroke patients rehab their hands at home without a therapist
- Moving patterns may help stroke survivors read faster
- Vibrating wearables put stroke walking to the test
- Robot plus electrical stimulation aims to rebuild arm movement after stroke
- Can a checklist and heart monitor stop repeat strokes?
- Heart hole or stroke trigger? global registry tracks who gets closure and what happens next