Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

New study tests which treatment is best for pelvic bone cancers

NCT ID NCT05033288

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now This study
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares three treatments for pelvic sarcomas (cancers in the pelvic bone): carbon ion therapy, surgery (often with radiation), and proton therapy alone. Researchers want to see which approach gives patients better quality of life and controls the cancer best. About 72 people aged 15 and older with newly diagnosed pelvic sarcomas that haven't spread will take part. The goal is to find out if carbon ion therapy offers advantages over the other options.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
carbon ion therapy, surgery, proton therapy
What this could lead to
If carbon ion therapy works better, it could offer a less invasive treatment option with fewer side effects for people with pelvic sarcomas.
What could go wrong
This is a relatively small study (72 people) comparing treatments that are already in use, so it may not lead to a major breakthrough. Results depend on which treatment each patient receives, and side effects from radiation or surgery are still possible.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

About 72 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Jan 2022

Expected to finish

Aug 2031

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

Patients with newly diagnosed, histologic confirmation of pelvic chordoma, chondrosarcoma, osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma with bone involvement, rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) with bone involvement or non-RMS soft tissue sarcoma with bone involvement treated with curative intent carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) at one of the carbon ion facilities in Europe or Asia or deemed appropriate to undergo definitive treatment with surgery or radiation therapy at Mayo Clinic (Minnesota, Florida, Arizona)

Ages

15 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Males and females \>= 15 years of age * Newly diagnosed, histologic confirmation of pelvic chordoma, chondrosarcoma, osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma with bone involvement, rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) with bone involvement or non-RMS soft tissue sarcoma with bone involvement * No evidence of distant sarcoma metastases as determined by clinical examination and any form of imaging * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) =\< 2 * Patients capable of childbearing must agree to use adequate contraception * Ability to complete questionnaire(s) by themselves or with assistance * Ability to provide written informed consent * Chemotherapy per institutional guidelines is allowed Exclusion Criteria: * Patients receiving palliative treatment * Recurrent disease * Males and females \< 15 years of age * Previous radiation therapy to the site of the sarcoma or area surrounding it such that it would be partially or completely encompassed by the radiation volume needed to treat the current sarcoma. In other words, treatment on this study would require re-irradiation of tissues * Patients with distant sarcoma metastases * Benign pelvic bone histologies * Any of the following: * Pregnant women * Nursing women * Men or women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Bone sarcoma are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The study's own enquiry address

    This study publishes an address for enquiries. See it below .

  2. The places running it

    3 sites. The list below names each one and where it is.

  3. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  4. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

  • Mayo Clinic in Arizona

    RECRUITING

    Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259, United States

    Contact Email: •••••@•••••

  • Mayo Clinic in Florida

    RECRUITING

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32224-9980, United States

    Contact Email: •••••@•••••

  • Mayo Clinic in Rochester

    RECRUITING

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

    Contact Email: •••••@•••••

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.