Wireless pacemaker takes on traditional device in heart study
NCT ID NCT05498376
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares a new leadless pacemaker (Micra AV) to a standard dual-chamber pacemaker in 100 patients aged 70 and older with heart block. The goal is to see if the leadless version works just as well for exercise capacity. Participants are randomly assigned to receive one of the two devices, and their exercise ability is measured after implantation.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Leadless pacemaker (Micra AV) and conventional dual-chamber pacemaker
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that a leadless pacemaker works as well as a traditional one for maintaining exercise ability, offering a less invasive option with fewer complications.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, single-center trial with only 100 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The leadless device may not match the conventional one in performance, and long-term benefits are still uncertain.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 4
Runs after approval, following long-term safety and how well the treatment works in everyday use.
- Participants
-
About 100 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Aug 2022
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
70 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients (≥70y) undergoing a de-novo pacemaker implantation due to intermittent or permanent AV block, qualifying for a conventional or leadless pacemaker * Written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Permanent atrial fibrillation or atrial standstill * Evidence of sinus node disease and need for right atrial pacing (not possible with Micra AV) * LVEF \<50% and permanent high-degree or total AVB (requiring CRT/His-Bundle/CSP pacing) * Preoperative E/A ratio \>1.5 in the echocardiography * Any co-existing ICD indications (no leadless ICD systems available) * Hemodialysis * Presence of a mechanical tricuspid valve prosthesis * Unwilling or unable to comply fully with study procedures and follow-up
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Arrhythmias, cardiac are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Inselspital, Bern University Hospital
Bern, 3010, Switzerland
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a nurse and a neighbor help tame chronic disease?
- Two eggs a day put to the test for heart health
- A soft patch that watches your heart beat in real time
- Why do some children arrive at the ER with a racing or skipping heart?
- Armband heart monitor takes on the holter in Head-to-Head test
- Can a Once-Daily form of tacrolimus spare liver transplant patients from side effects?