Which oxygen strategy saves more lives? large trial puts three methods to the test
NCT ID NCT05812911
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This trial tests whether high-flow nasal cannula oxygen or noninvasive ventilation works better than standard oxygen therapy for ICU patients with acute respiratory failure. About 1,470 adults will be randomly assigned to one of the three methods. The main goal is to see which approach lowers the chance of death within 28 days.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- oxygen therapy (high-flow nasal cannula, noninvasive ventilation, standard oxygen)
- What this could lead to
- If one method proves superior, it could become the standard approach to help more ICU patients survive acute respiratory failure.
- What could go wrong
- The trial is large but results may show no clear winner, or benefits may not apply to all types of respiratory failure. Risks include discomfort or injury from the devices.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
1,470 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
May 2023
- Finished
-
May 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Adult (age ≥ 18 years) * A diagnosis of hypoxemic ARF occurring defined as the presence and persistence for more than 30 minutes of hypoxemia (defined by a partial oxygen pressure \<60 mm Hg when breathing room air or \<80 mmHg when breathing 15 L/min of oxygen or a peripheral oxygen saturation \[SpO2\] ≤90% when breathing room air and/or a PaO2(partial pressure of oxygen)/FiO2 ratio \< 300 mmHg plus either \[1\] a respiratory rate higher than 30/min or \[2\] clinical signs suggestive of intense respiratory muscle work and/or labored breathing, such as use of accessory respiratory muscles, paradoxical motion of the abdomen, or intercostal retraction). Exclusion Criteria: * Contraindications to NIV and/or HFNO * Sleep apnea syndrome with home ventilator * Immediate tracheal intubation * Requirement for an emergent surgical procedure requiring intubation * Hypercapnia with a formal indication for NIV (formal indication for NIV with PaCO2 ≥ 50 mmHg or clinical signs of hypercapnia) * Isolated cardiogenic pulmonary edema (formal indication for NIV). Patients with pulmonary edema associated with another ARF etiology can be included. * Anatomical factors precluding the use of NIV and/or HFNO * Patients with limitation or withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies with a do-not-intubate order * Pregnancy in progress or planned during the study period or breastfeeding women * Patients protected by law (Art. L1121-6 and L1121-8 of the Code de la Santé Publique): Adult protected by law or patient under guardianship or curatorship * Subjects not covered by public health insurance * Absence of written informed consent from the patient or his or her proxy (if present) before inclusion or when possible when the patient has been included in an emergency setting
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute respiratory failure are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Montpellier University Hospital - Saint Eloi Hospital
Montpellier, 34295, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- A global effort to make moving critically ill patients safer
- Healing together: could a Couples-Based program ease ICU aftermath?
- Are ventilated patients starving in silence? a new study investigates
- Can a simple inhaled combo keep pneumonia patients off ventilators?
- Can a Diaphragm-Sensing ventilator mode reduce breathing asynchrony?
- Ultrasound may reveal hidden causes of ventilator weaning failure