Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Which oxygen strategy saves more lives? large trial puts three methods to the test

NCT ID NCT05812911

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early This study
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This trial tests whether high-flow nasal cannula oxygen or noninvasive ventilation works better than standard oxygen therapy for ICU patients with acute respiratory failure. About 1,470 adults will be randomly assigned to one of the three methods. The main goal is to see which approach lowers the chance of death within 28 days.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
oxygen therapy (high-flow nasal cannula, noninvasive ventilation, standard oxygen)
What this could lead to
If one method proves superior, it could become the standard approach to help more ICU patients survive acute respiratory failure.
What could go wrong
The trial is large but results may show no clear winner, or benefits may not apply to all types of respiratory failure. Risks include discomfort or injury from the devices.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

1,470 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

May 2023

Finished

May 2026

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Adult (age ≥ 18 years) * A diagnosis of hypoxemic ARF occurring defined as the presence and persistence for more than 30 minutes of hypoxemia (defined by a partial oxygen pressure \<60 mm Hg when breathing room air or \<80 mmHg when breathing 15 L/min of oxygen or a peripheral oxygen saturation \[SpO2\] ≤90% when breathing room air and/or a PaO2(partial pressure of oxygen)/FiO2 ratio \< 300 mmHg plus either \[1\] a respiratory rate higher than 30/min or \[2\] clinical signs suggestive of intense respiratory muscle work and/or labored breathing, such as use of accessory respiratory muscles, paradoxical motion of the abdomen, or intercostal retraction). Exclusion Criteria: * Contraindications to NIV and/or HFNO * Sleep apnea syndrome with home ventilator * Immediate tracheal intubation * Requirement for an emergent surgical procedure requiring intubation * Hypercapnia with a formal indication for NIV (formal indication for NIV with PaCO2 ≥ 50 mmHg or clinical signs of hypercapnia) * Isolated cardiogenic pulmonary edema (formal indication for NIV). Patients with pulmonary edema associated with another ARF etiology can be included. * Anatomical factors precluding the use of NIV and/or HFNO * Patients with limitation or withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies with a do-not-intubate order * Pregnancy in progress or planned during the study period or breastfeeding women * Patients protected by law (Art. L1121-6 and L1121-8 of the Code de la Santé Publique): Adult protected by law or patient under guardianship or curatorship * Subjects not covered by public health insurance * Absence of written informed consent from the patient or his or her proxy (if present) before inclusion or when possible when the patient has been included in an emergency setting

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute respiratory failure are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Montpellier University Hospital - Saint Eloi Hospital

    Montpellier, 34295, France

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.