Ultrasound may reveal hidden causes of ventilator weaning failure
NCT ID NCT02723565
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study explores whether ultrasound can identify the reasons some patients fail to come off a mechanical ventilator. Researchers will scan the heart, lungs, and diaphragm of adults who have been on a ventilator for at least 24 hours and have not passed a spontaneous breathing trial. The goal is to see if ultrasound can accurately diagnose the physiological problem behind weaning failure, which could help doctors choose better treatments in the future.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If ultrasound can pinpoint the cause of weaning failure, doctors could tailor treatments to help more patients breathe on their own sooner.
- What could go wrong
- This is a very small, early study with only 7 participants, so results may not apply to all patients. Ultrasound may not be accurate enough to replace standard methods.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
7 people
The number who actually took part.
- Start date
-
Apr 2014
- Finished
-
Dec 2018
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Patients in the intensive care unit.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * patients over 18 years of age receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours * patients who fulfill standard criteria for readiness for a trial of spontaneous breathing (no or minimal sedation, patient awake and interactive; minimal vasopressor/inotrope requirements (Norepinephrine \< or = 0.1, Dopamine \< 10, Vasopressin/Epinephrine off); fraction of inspired oxygen \< or = 50%; spontaneous inspiratory efforts as indicated by patient-triggered breaths; positive end-expiratory pressure \< or = 10 cm H20) * patients who fail a trial of spontaneous breathing (transient reduction of ventilator support for any duration up to 2 hours as per local ICU practice - typically PS 5 with PEEP 5 OR CPAP 5 OR T-piece) Exclusion Criteria: * patients with a coagulopathy (INR \> 2.5, platelet count \< 30x10\^6/L) or previously diagnosed bleeding diathesis or are receiving anticoagulant drugs at therapeutic doses (ie. excluding venous thromboembolic prophylaxis) * patients with a contraindication to nasogastric tube insertion (esophageal varices, upper GI tract surgery, facial trauma, etc.) * patients receiving extra-corporeal life support
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute respiratory failure are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Mount Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5, Canada
-
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada
-
University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2N2, Canada
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- A global effort to make moving critically ill patients safer
- Healing together: could a Couples-Based program ease ICU aftermath?
- Heartbeat clues could forecast ventilator freedom
- Are ventilated patients starving in silence? a new study investigates
- Can a tiny, No-Moving-Parts respirator replace ventilators in a crisis?
- Can a simple inhaled combo keep pneumonia patients off ventilators?