Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Pregnancy anesthesia Check-Ups: can a video call replace a hospital visit?

NCT ID NCT07542197

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting This study
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study will compare the quality of pre-anesthesia consultations done by video call versus in-person for pregnant women. 250 participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two methods. The main goal is to see if the video consultation misses any important safety information needed before delivery.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
teleconsultation
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that teleconsultation is as effective as in-person visits for pre-anesthesia checks in pregnancy, potentially reducing travel and environmental impact.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage study (250 people) comparing two consultation methods, not testing a new treatment. Results may not apply to all hospitals or patients.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 250 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Expected to start

Jun 2026

An estimate. Start dates often move.

Expected to finish

Jun 2028

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Female participants only

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Pregnant patients scheduled to give birth at the Bordeaux University Hospital, ASA score 1 or 2, for their primary pregnancy, who have booked an anesthesia appointment on one of the half-days when teleconsultation is available in the department * Have access to the internet and functional computer equipment (smartphone, computer) * Have a valid email address and telephone number Exclusion Criteria: * Minor patient (under 18 years old at the time of inclusion) * Individuals not affiliated with or beneficiaries of a social security scheme * Patients who do not speak French * Persons under legal guardianship * Psychiatric conditions that impair the ability to consent to or participate in the study * Severe spinal pathology (scoliosis requiring a brace or surgery, ankylosing spondylitis), history of spinal surgery * Comorbidities with ASA score ≥3

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Anesthesia are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Personal Satisfaction

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • CHU de Bordeaux

    Bordeaux, France

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.