Please sign in to follow a disease.
Laser vs. electric cleaning: which saves your dental implant?
NCT ID NCT07529444
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tests three ways to clean infected dental implants: a laser with riboflavin, an electrolytic device, and a standard antiseptic rinse. Researchers will measure how well each method removes harmful bacteria from 90 non-smoking participants. The goal is to find the best cleaning approach before bone regeneration surgery.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Laser photodynamic therapy, electrolytic cleaning device, and chlorhexidine rinse
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could identify a more effective cleaning method to treat peri-implantitis and help save infected dental implants.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage study measuring bacteria levels, not long-term implant survival. Results may not apply to smokers or complex cases.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 90 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Mar 2026
- Expected to finish
-
Jun 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: Patients presenting with at least one bone-level dental implant affected by peri-implantitis. The affected implant must be deemed viable with a perspective for preservation/retention in the dental arch. Patients must be non-smokers. Patients in good general health, classified as ASA I (a normal healthy patient) or ASA II (a patient with mild systemic disease) according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system. Exclusion Criteria: Presence of vertical bone loss around the affected implant. Implants that are not bone-level (e.g., tissue-level implants). Patients with any systemic comorbidities. Patients who are currently smokers. Implants with a poor prognosis that cannot be preserved in the dental arch.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Dental implant complications are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
School of Dental Medicine
RECRUITINGZagreb, 10000, Croatia
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Digital vs. goo: which dental impression method leads to more accurate implants?
- Laser shows promise for treating implant gum disease
- Saliva test may catch implant gum disease early
- New brush and slurry combo could save failing dental implants
- 25-year dental implant study reveals secrets to long-term success
- 3D-Printed guides may improve dental implant success and reduce pain