Could virtual reality replace dummy arms for training nurses?

NCT ID NCT07673224

First seen Jun 29, 2026 · Last updated Jun 30, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares immersive virtual reality (VR) training with traditional part-task trainer simulation for teaching phlebotomy (blood draw) to nursing students. About 60 second-year students with no prior venipuncture experience are randomly assigned to either VR or standard training. Researchers measure self-efficacy, anxiety, and clinical performance before, right after, and at a follow-up session to see which method works better.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Immersive Virtual Reality Training
What this could lead to
If effective, VR could become a standard tool for teaching clinical skills, making training more engaging and accessible.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage study with 60 students at one university. Results may not apply to other settings or skills.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for IMMERSIVE VIRTUAL REALITY are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Al-Quds University

    Abū Dīs, Jerusalem, 5100, Palestinian Territories

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.